Skip to Main Content

Latest News

Advertisement
Advertise Here
July 15, 2010

FDA Panel Votes In Favor Of Avandia

Drug Safety: Controversy over hidden risks of diabetes drug prompts calls for action by agency

Britt Erickson

Newscom
Concerns about the safety of Avandia prompted an FDA advisory panel to recommend stronger warnings be placed on the drug.
  • Print this article
  • Email the editor

Latest News



October 28, 2011

Speedy Homemade-Explosive Detector

Forensic Chemistry: A new method could increase the number of explosives detected by airport screeners.

Solar Panel Makers Cry Foul

Trade: U.S. companies complain of market dumping by China.

Novartis To Cut 2,000 Jobs

Layoffs follow similar moves by Amgen, AstraZeneca.

Nations Break Impasse On Waste

Environment: Ban to halt export of hazardous waste to developing world.

New Leader For Lawrence Livermore

Penrose (Parney) Albright will direct DOE national lab.

Hair Reveals Source Of People's Exposure To Mercury

Toxic Exposure: Mercury isotopes in human hair illuminate dietary and industrial sources.

Why The Long Fat?

Cancer Biochemistry: Mass spectrometry follows the metabolism of very long fatty acids in cancer cells.

Text Size A A

An advisory panel of the Food & Drug Administration voted yesterday to keep the controversial diabetes drug Avandia (rosiglitazone) on the market, despite evidence linking the drug to an increased risk of heart disease. The panel did, however, recommend stricter warning labels for the drug.

FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg will now have to decide what action to take. The agency is under pressure to move swiftly from members of Congress and advocacy groups, who claim that GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the maker of Avandia, hid data relevant to the safety of the drug.

The Senate Finance Committee, in particular, has been investigating the safety of Avandia since 2007. In a report released in February, the committee found that GSK promoted the drug despite studies suggesting serious health risks. Committee Chairman Max S. Baucus (D-Mont.) and ranking member Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) sent more details of that investigation to FDA on July 12.

The finance committee's investigation uncovered e-mails from executives of GSK discussing whether to publish studies that found problems with Avandia. In one e-mail dated July 20, 2001, an executive wrote: "We would hope that these do not see the light of day." The committee provided FDA with several other e-mails, suggesting that the company tried to hide studies that pointed to an increased risk of heart disease with Avandia compared with its rival drug, Actos (pioglitazone), made by Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

GSK responded to the finance committee's investigation, saying the e-mails were taken out of context from product liability litigation. The drug maker is facing thousands of lawsuits alleging it failed to alert consumers to risks of heart failure and other injuries related to taking Avandia.

"The Senate Finance Committee has released a small subset of the 14 million pages of documents provided to plaintiffs' counsel in the product liability litigation," the company said in a statement. "GSK has been diligent in providing its safety data on Avandia to the FDA and in publishing its clinical trial data in peer-reviewed journals or on its clinical trial website."

Avandia was approved by FDA in 1999. The once blockbuster drug saw its sales plummet in 2007, following a paper published by Steven E. Nissen, a cardiologist with the Cleveland Clinic, that showed Avandia increases the risk of heart disease.

FDA was first warned about the heart risks of Avandia four years ago by one of its own scientists, who eventually left the agency after being reprimanded for suggesting that a warning be placed on the drug, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists, an advocacy group. "It is time for the agency to give its own scientists the respect they deserve when they raise red flags about the drugs they're evaluating," stressed Francesca Grifo, director of scientific integrity at the Union of Concerned Scientists. "We have a new Administration in office, and in spite of efforts by FDA leadership, it is still business as usual at the agency."

Grassley said he intends to keep pushing FDA to reform its drug safety office with respect to post-market monitoring. "What's happened with this drug further makes the case about the need to strengthen the office within the FDA that monitors drug safety after a drug is on the market," he said.

More On This Topic

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society
  • Print this article
  • Email the editor

Services & Tools

ACS Resources

ACS is the leading employment source for recruiting scientific professionals. ACS Careers and C&EN Classifieds provide employers direct access to scientific talent both in print and online. Jobseekers | Employers

» Join ACS

Join more than 161,000 professionals in the chemical sciences world-wide, as a member of the American Chemical Society.
» Join Now!