[an error occurred while processing this directive]
C&EN logo The Newsmagazine of the Chemical World
Home Current Issue ChemJobs Join ACS
Support
Latest News
Business
Government & Policy
Science/Technology
Careers and Employment
ACS News
topics
   
Support
 
Support
How to log in
Contact Us
Site Map
   
About C&EN
About the Magazine
How to Subscribe
How to Advertise
Chemcyclopedia

Latest News RSS Feed

latest news RSS feedWhat is this?

   
Join ACS
Join ACS
  Latest News  
  September 27,  2004
Volume 82, Number 39
p. 9
 

INTERNATIONAL POLICY

  Chemical Treaty Covers 14 More Substances  

CHERYL HOGUE
   
 
  Fourteen substances were added last week to the international agreement that requires an exporting nation to obtain advance approval from developing countries before shipping certain chemicals to them.

Treaty partners added the 14 substances to the initial 22 pesticides and five industrial chemicals covered by the 1998 Rotterdam Convention. The pact requires developing countries to give prior informed consent before they allow imports of listed materials.?

Appended to the accord were binapacryl; 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol and its salts; dustable powder pesticide formulations containing a combination of benomyl at or above 7%, carbofuran at or above 10%, and thiram at or above 15%; ethylene dichloride; ethylene oxide; monocrotophos; parathion; and toxaphene. Also added were four types of asbestos--actinolite, anthophyllite, amosite, and tremolite--and two fuel additives, tetraethyllead and tetramethyllead.

At the urging of several countries, including Canada, China, India, Mexico, Russia, Ukraine, and Zimbabwe, treaty participants agreed not to include one substance proposed for listing--chrysotile asbestos. The European Union, New Zealand, Argentina, and environmental groups argued in favor of listing chrysotile, the most widely used form of asbestos.

Last week's meeting, held in Geneva, was the first official gathering of partners to the Rotterdam Convention. The U.S. has signed the accord but is not yet a treaty partner because Congress has not passed legislation making U.S. laws consistent with the pact (C&EN, March 29, page 22).

 
     
  Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2004
 


Related Story
U.S. Vote At Treaty Meetings Threatened
[C&EN, Mar. 29, 2004]

 
E-mail this article
to a friend
Print this article
E-mail the editor