[an error occurred while processing this directive]
C&EN logo The Newsmagazine of the Chemical World
Home Current Issue ChemJobs Join ACS
Latest News
Government & Policy
Careers and Employment
ACS News
How to log in
Contact Us
Site Map
About C&EN
About the Magazine
How to Subscribe
How to Advertise

Latest News RSS Feed

latest news RSS feedWhat is this?

Join ACS
Join ACS
  Latest News  
  October 18,  2004
Volume 82, Number 42
p. 9


Chemical producers, drugmakers, refiners win with new legislation



The corporate tax overhaul just approved by Congress and expected to be signed by President George W. Bush will benefit chemical and pharmaceutical companies and some refiners, as well as manufacturers of all sorts.

The initial motivation for the bill was to overturn a corporate tax break that the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled is an illegal subsidy for U.S. exporters. Under this tax break, U.S. companies are allowed to exclude a portion of their foreign sales income from federal taxes. The exclusion is worth an estimated $500 million a year to basic chemical manufacturers.

Since March, the European Union has collected millions of dollars each month in WTO-approved tariffs on many U.S. exports in retaliation for the tax break.

The new law eliminates the disputed tax break and replaces it with an estimated $137 billion in new cuts over 10 years, with about $77 billion directed to manufacturers.

A chemical industry source says the new tax law will be complicated for the IRS to administer and for companies to comply with. But overall, he says, "it's a win" for manufacturers, including chemical makers.

One part of the new law allows multinational companies to bring profits they made at operations abroad into the U.S. at a 5.25% tax rate, instead of standard corporate rates of up to 35%. The Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America lobbied for this provision. PhRMA spokesman Jeff Trewhitt says this section of the law "could contribute to the creation of important new jobs in the U.S."

In contrast, most multinational chemical producers typically pour the profits they make offshore back into their foreign operations rather than bring the funds to the U.S., the chemical industry source says. However, some chemical manufacturers--and many customers of the industry--may avail themselves of the new tax provision, so "it may be good for business," the source tells C&EN.

Other provisions of the legislation are drawn from long-stalled energy legislation. Some $2.3 billion in tax benefits over 10 years would go to electricity generators that use renewable energy sources. But along with electricity made from biomass, municipal waste, animal waste, geothermal, solar, and other renewable sources, the covered sources were expanded to include "refined coal," defined as a coal-based fuel with 20% fewer air emissions, not including CO2, than conventional coal.

Several other provisions are directed to fuels. One gives $119 million in tax cuts to small refineries to help cover their cost of compliance with regulations for low-sulfur diesel fuel. The bill offers $110 million in tax breaks for oil and gas stripper well owners and continues the tax subsidy for ethanol in fuels. It includes $150 million in tax incentives for Alaskan natural gas pipeline construction and $295 million in tax breaks for Alaskan natural gas processors.

Also, the legislation is designed to encourage tax-exempt investors, such as university endowments, foundations, and pension funds, to invest in the cleanup and redevelopment of contaminated industrial land. It waives taxes on capital gains from the sale of these properties after they are cleaned up.

This so-called brownfields provision is "potentially very significant for some companies," says the chemical industry source.

  Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2004

Related Stories
Trade And Taxes
[C&EN, Jan. 5, 2004]  
E-mail this article
to a friend
Print this article
E-mail the editor