[an error occurred while processing this directive]
C&EN logo The Newsmagazine of the Chemical World
Home Current Issue ChemJobs Join ACS
Support
Latest News
Business
Government & Policy
Science/Technology
Careers and Employment
ACS News
topics
   
Support
 
Support
How to log in
Contact Us
Site Map
   
About C&EN
About the Magazine
How to Subscribe
How to Advertise
Chemcyclopedia

Latest News RSS Feed

latest news RSS feedWhat is this?

   
Join ACS
Join ACS
  Latest News  
  November 15,  2004
Volume 82, Number 46
p. 7
 

RISK ASSESSMENT

  Chemical Exposure Study Suspended
Panel will review EPA study for ethical, conflict-of-interest concerns
 

BETTE HILEMAN
   
 
 
8246NOTW3_child.tifcxd
ON HOLD Suspended study was intended to monitor children's exposure to chemicals at home..

PHOTODISC

EPA has suspended, until next spring at the earliest, a controversial study that was to try to discover how pesticides and certain other common household chemicals get into children's blood.

The agency has decided to ask a group of independent experts to reexamine the study design, which has already been reviewed by four panels.

The chemicals to be measured include pesticides, phthalates, brominated diphenyl ethers (flame retardants), and perfluorinated chemicals. In October, the American Chemistry Council (ACC) contributed about $2 million to support the $9 million study, allowing the monitored chemicals to be expanded beyond pesticides (C&EN, Oct. 18, page 10).

According to the original design, the research was to involve 60 children from birth to three years of age, all from Duval County, Fla. Each participating family was to receive up to $970 and a video camcorder. The original brochure and fact sheet on EPA's website both stated that to be selected, participants "must spray or have sprayed pesticides" inside their homes routinely during the two-year study period. After press reports made an issue of this, however, EPA removed almost all information about the study from the brochure and changed the fact sheet to read, "You must maintain your normal pesticide or nonpesticide use patterns for your household."

Rank-and-file EPA scientists around the U.S. questioned the study, saying low-income families might consent to pesticide use because of the money involved, and that accepting industry funding could compromise EPA's independence. They also criticized the study design for not requiring that participating families be informed of potential dangers of pesticide use.

In a statement, ACC says it "continues to strongly support the study because of the great importance of increasing understanding of the exposures of young children to pesticides and other chemicals."

 
     
  Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2004
 


Related Stories
Chemical Exposure And Children
[C&EN, Oct. 18, 2004]
 
E-mail this article
to a friend
Print this article
E-mail the editor