[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skip to Main Content

Latest News

October 28, 2010

ACS's Next Day In Court

The Ohio Supreme Court will hear an appeal of American Chemical Society v. Leadscope Inc.

William Schulz

  • Print this article
  • Email the editor

Latest News



October 28, 2011

Speedy Homemade-Explosive Detector

Forensic Chemistry: A new method could increase the number of explosives detected by airport screeners.

Solar Panel Makers Cry Foul

Trade: U.S. companies complain of market dumping by China.

Novartis To Cut 2,000 Jobs

Layoffs follow similar moves by Amgen, AstraZeneca.

Nations Break Impasse On Waste

Environment: Ban to halt export of hazardous waste to developing world.

New Leader For Lawrence Livermore

Penrose (Parney) Albright will direct DOE national lab.

Hair Reveals Source Of People's Exposure To Mercury

Toxic Exposure: Mercury isotopes in human hair illuminate dietary and industrial sources.

Why The Long Fat?

Cancer Biochemistry: Mass spectrometry follows the metabolism of very long fatty acids in cancer cells.

Text Size A A

An appeal of American Chemical Society v. Leadscope Inc., the intellectual property suit the society has been fighting doggedly for nearly a decade, will be heard by the Supreme Court of Ohio (C&EN, Aug. 9, page 9). A date for opening statements was not provided in the court's Oct. 27 announcement.

The legal battle stretches back to 2002, when ACS brought suit against Leadscope and three former ACS employees who founded the company. ACS alleged that the defendants improperly used ACS's intellectual property to develop, patent, and market Leadscope software products. The jury found against ACS on these claims.

At the same time, the Leadscope defendants filed a counterclaim against ACS, charging malicious litigation in filing its suit, defamation, tortious interference with business relations, unfair competition, and deceptive trade practices. The lower court found in favor of Leadscope on all but the last of the counterclaims. An Ohio appeals court affirmed the jury's decisions and awarded some $40 million in compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorneys' fees and court costs, to the defendants.

The ACS appeal to the Ohio high court centers on constitutional questions, including the size of the award, rather than seeking a reversal of the jury's decision. In a statement, ACS said, 'We are pleased the court has agreed to hear the matter and look forward to presenting our case."

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society
  • Print this article
  • Email the editor

Services & Tools

ACS Resources

ACS is the leading employment source for recruiting scientific professionals. ACS Careers and C&EN Classifieds provide employers direct access to scientific talent both in print and online. Jobseekers | Employers

» Join ACS

Join more than 161,000 professionals in the chemical sciences world-wide, as a member of the American Chemical Society.
» Join Now!