[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skip to Main Content

Latest News

Advertisement
Advertise Here
November 22, 2010
Volume 88, Number 47
p. 7

Pathogens: Biodefense Lab Planned For Kansas Could Hurt Cattle, NRC Report Says

Glenn Hess

  • Print this article
  • Email the editor

Latest News



October 28, 2011

Speedy Homemade-Explosive Detector

Forensic Chemistry: A new method could increase the number of explosives detected by airport screeners.

Solar Panel Makers Cry Foul

Trade: U.S. companies complain of market dumping by China.

Novartis To Cut 2,000 Jobs

Layoffs follow similar moves by Amgen, AstraZeneca.

Nations Break Impasse On Waste

Environment: Ban to halt export of hazardous waste to developing world.

New Leader For Lawrence Livermore

Penrose (Parney) Albright will direct DOE national lab.

Hair Reveals Source Of People's Exposure To Mercury

Toxic Exposure: Mercury isotopes in human hair illuminate dietary and industrial sources.

Why The Long Fat?

Cancer Biochemistry: Mass spectrometry follows the metabolism of very long fatty acids in cancer cells.

Text Size A A

The Department of Homeland Security is underestimating the risk that a dangerous animal pathogen could accidentally be released from a proposed biodefense laboratory in the heart of Kansas cattle country, a panel of scientists said last week.

A report by a committee of the National Research Council says there is a nearly 70% chance over the 50-year lifetime of the planned National Bio & Agro-Defense Facility that a highly contagious animal illness, such as foot-and-mouth disease, could escape and infect livestock.

In 2008, DHS announced that it would replace the aging Plum Island Animal Disease Center, off the tip of New York’s Long Island, with a $650 million lab in Manhattan, Kan., home of Kansas State University. But Congress last year blocked funding for the facility’s construction until federal authorities and NRC analyzed safety concerns.

NRC says an earlier DHS study, completed in June, failed to adequately consider the risk and potential impact of an outbreak. “Roughly 9.5% of the U.S. cattle inventory lies within a 200-mile radius of the facility,” the NRC report notes. “Given that the disease [foot-and-mouth] is highly contagious and that the chance of its escape is not zero, rigorous and robust regional and national mitigation strategies … are needed before the facility opens.”

Ultimately, policymakers will need to decide whether the risks are acceptable, says panel chair Ronald Atlas, a microbiologist at the University of Louisville.

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society
  • Print this article
  • Email the editor

Services & Tools

ACS Resources

ACS is the leading employment source for recruiting scientific professionals. ACS Careers and C&EN Classifieds provide employers direct access to scientific talent both in print and online. Jobseekers | Employers

» Join ACS

Join more than 161,000 professionals in the chemical sciences world-wide, as a member of the American Chemical Society.
» Join Now!