Visit Atofina
Home | This Week's Contents  |  C&EN ClassifiedsSearch C&EN Online

 
Millennium Special Report
C&EN 75th Anniversary Issue
 
Related Stories
CLEANING UP THE AIR WITH CHEMICALS
[C&EN, Jan. 22, 2001]
Clean Air Act's Day In Court
[C&EN, Nov. 13, 2000]

Program To Control Hazardous Air Pollutants Faces New Challenges
[C&EN, October 30, 2000]

BODY BURDENS OF POLLUTANTS
[C&EN, July 31, 2000]

CLEAN AIR ACT DEALT MAJOR BLOW
[C&EN, May 24, 1999]

Two Major Refiners Agree To Cut Air Pollution
[C&EN, July 31, 2000]

Related Sites
EPA

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration's Aeronomy Laboratory

E-mail this article to a friend
Print this article
E-mail the editor
 
 
 
 Table of Contents
 C&EN Classifieds
 News of the Week
 Cover Story
 Editor's Page
 Business
 Government & Policy
 Science/Technology
 Concentrates
  Business
  Government & Policy
  Science/Technology
 Education
 ACS News
 Calendars
 Books
 Digital Briefs
 ACS Comments
 Career & Employment
 Special Reports
 Letters
 Newscripts
 Nanotechnology
 What's That Stuff?
 Pharmaceutical Century

 Hot Articles
 Safety  Letters
 Chemcyclopedia

 Back Issues

 How to Subscribe
 Subscription Changes
 About C&EN
 Copyright Permission
 E-mail webmaster

ACS 125 years

NEWS OF THE WEEK
ENVIRONMENT
April 30, 2001
Volume 79, Number 18
CENEAR 79 18 pp. 10
ISSN 0009-2347
[Previous Story] [Next Story]

HARD NOX: NOT ALL EMISSIONS ARE EQUAL
Size of emissions, location of power plants affect ozone production

PAMELA ZURER

When it comes to producing the ozone that's a major component of smog, not all nitrogen oxide emissions are equal. Size matters, it turns out, and so does location. These findings, from detailed measurements within exhaust plumes of coal-fired power plants, have major implications for air-pollution control strategies.

Ozone is produced in the troposphere when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) stew in sunlight with nitrogen oxides--NO and NO2, collectively known as NOx--from combustion sources. Controls on VOCs have had some effect on reducing smog levels. But NOx levels are also an important factor, so EPA has issued regulations limiting NOx emissions from about 400 U.S. power plants.

Atmospheric scientists now report that reducing NOx emissions at certain plants would get you more bang for the buck than if cuts were made at other plants [Science, 292, 719 (2001)]. Research chemist Thomas B. Ryerson at the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration's Aeronomy Laboratory in Boulder, Colo., and colleagues find that, all else being equal, power plant plumes with lower concentrations of NOx produce more ozone per unit of NOx emitted than plumes with higher NOx concentrations. And power plants located near forests that release significant quantities of hydrocarbons create proportionally more ozone than plants located away from such natural VOC sources.

"Theoretical calculations and photochemical models have been predicting this kind of behavior, but our aircraft measurements nailed down a lot of uncertainties," Ryerson tells C&EN. "We were surprised to see such a large dependency on these factors."

The findings are good news, Ryerson notes, in that they identify features that can be easily addressed in NOx control strategies. For example: "From the standpoint of air quality, forests aren't the best place for power plants."

NIX ON NOX Capping emissions from several smaller power plants may be more effective than equivalent reductions from one large plant.
COURTESY OF TOM RYERSON

[Previous Story] [Next Story]



Top


Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society


Home | Table of Contents | News of the Week | Cover Story
Business | Government & Policy | Science/Technology
Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society - All Right Reserved
1155 16th Street NW • Washington DC 20036 • (202) 872-4600 • (800) 227-5558


CASChemPortChemCenterPubs Page