Home | This Week's Contents  |  C&EN ClassifiedsSearch C&EN Online

 
Millennium Special Report
C&EN 75th Anniversary Issue
 
Related Stories
Ethanol's Sunny Day
[C&EN, July 23, 2001]

BOOST FOR ETHANOL
[C&EN, June 18, 2001]

MTBE Substitutes
[C&EN, June 26, 2000]

TO MTBE, OR NOT TO MTBE
[C&EN, May 8, 2000]

Methanol Woes As MTBE Goes
[C&EN, April 17, 2000]

GETTING THE MTBE OUT
[C&EN, Mar. 17, 2000]]

Related Sites
Energy Department

Oxygenated Fuels Association

E-mail this article to a friend
Print this article
E-mail the editor
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Table of Contents
 C&EN Classifieds
 News of the Week
 Cover Story
 Editor's Page
 Business
 Government & Policy
 Science/Technology
 Concentrates
  Business
  Government & Policy
  Science/Technology
 Education
 ACS News
 Calendars
 Books
 Digital Briefs
 ACS Comments
 Career & Employment
 Special Reports
 Letters
 Newscripts
 Nanotechnology
 What's That Stuff?
 Pharmaceutical Century

 Hot Articles
 Safety  Letters
 Chemcyclopedia

 Back Issues

 How to Subscribe
 Subscription Changes
 About C&EN
 Copyright Permission
 E-mail webmaster
NEWS OF THE WEEK
ENVIRONMENT
October 1, 2001
Volume 79, Number 40
CENEAR 79 40 p. 16
ISSN 0009-2347
[Previous Story] [Next Story]

MTBE BAN ADVANCES
Senate committee approves bill to eliminate gasoline additive

CHERYL HOGUE

The senate is preparing to debate new legislation that would ban the addition of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) to gasoline.

7742govin1x
PHOTO BY DAVID J. HANSON
The sponsors of the bill (S. 950) want to curtail contamination of drinking water wells with MTBE. The substance imparts a foul odor and taste to water.

But the Energy Department says the bill could cut U.S. gasoline supplies, especially in the summer, since MTBE is added as a fuel extender. DOE estimates the ban would cut the volume of gasoline produced in the U.S. by 400,000 barrels per day.

As approved by the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee last week, S. 950 would ban the use of MTBE in gasoline within four years. It would also allow state governors to waive a requirement in the Clean Air Act that reformulated gasoline, sold in heavily polluted urban areas, must contain 2% oxygen by weight to prevent smog-forming emissions. Refiners say they can produce cleaner-burning gasoline without oxygenates.

Corn and ethanol producers want to retain the oxygen requirement, thus ensuring expansion of the market for ethanol as an oxygen-boosting gasoline additive. Sen. James M. Jeffords (I-Vt.), chairman of the committee, says that, while he wants a renewable fuels requirement added to the bill, he does not favor retaining the oxygen mandate.

The Oxygenated Fuels Association, which supports the oxygen requirement, says the bill as it currently stands would force gasoline prices up and increase air pollution. "This ill-conceived legislation will reduce U.S. gasoline supplies at a time when we can least afford it," says association President Tom Adams.

Jeffords acknowledges the road ahead is a rough one for S. 950. "There must be a grand negotiation and political compromise in order to ban MTBE," he says.

[Previous Story] [Next Story]



Top


Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society


Home | Table of Contents | News of the Week | Cover Story
Business | Government & Policy | Science/Technology
Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society - All Right Reserved
1155 16th Street NW • Washington DC 20036 • (202) 872-4600 • (800) 227-5558


CASChemPortChemCenterPubs Page