How To Reach C&ENACS Membership Number


 

March 22, 2004
Volume 82, Number 12
CENEAR 82 12 p. 9
ISSN 0009-2347


SECURITY RESEARCH

DHS REVISES RESEARCH PLAN
Political pressure leads to a reversal on national labs’ eligibility

LOIS EMBER

Leadership in the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Science & Technology Directorate has bowed to political pressure and jettisoned a plan forged late last year to divvy up security research among the Department of Energy’s eight national laboratories.

Initially, the directorate assigned the five DOE weapons labs—Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Pacific Northwest, and Sandia—to its $120 million intramural program, making them eligible to compete for and carry out homeland-security-related classified research. Three other national labs—Argonne, Brookhaven, and Idaho National Environmental & Engineering—were assigned to the directorate’s $213 million extramural program and would have had to compete with the private sector for DHS contracts.

McQueary
DHS PHOTO
This two-tier plan was perceived as treating the intramural labs as special and placing theextramural labs at a funding disadvantage. Pressure from congressional delegations representing the three extramural labs spurred DHS’s decision to allow all of the labs to compete equally for all homeland security research. House Science Committee Chairman Sherwood L. Boehlert (R-N.Y.), who represents Brookhaven’s district, called the reversal “a big win ... for common sense.”

But the reversal also glosses over a detriment. As Nancy B. Jackson, a Sandia manager, points out, “This political infighting is what makes DHS so slow in getting programs started.”

Much of DHS’s R&D efforts are heavily weighted to near-term development and deployment of counterterrorism technologies. At a congressional hearing, Charles E. McQueary, DHS undersecretary for science and technology, admitted that basic research funding was—at least initially—being shortchanged. He noted that basic research funding would drop to $80 million in fiscal 2005 from its current level of $117 million. But, he said, the directorate’s research emphasis over time would “evolve into more fundamental research” and the funding would go back up.



Top


Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society



 
Related Stories
DIVVYING UP THE WORK
[C&EN, Jan. 26, 2004]

C&EN TAKS WITH CHARLES E. MCQUEARY
[C&EN, Apr. 21, 2003]

HOMELAND SECURITY
[C&EN Archive]

E-mail this article to a friend
Print this article
E-mail the editor
   

Home | Table of Contents | Today's Headlines | Business | Government & Policy | Science & Technology | C&EN Classifieds
About C&EN | How To Reach Us | How to Advertise | Editorial Calendar | Email Webmaster

Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.
• (202) 872-4600 • (800) 227-5558

CASChemPortChemCenterPubs Page