|
![]() |
|
Silver removal and recovery from effluent streamsThe conventional technology for recovering silver from aqueous effluent streams is based on electrodeposition. For example, starting from a 5 g/L solution, silver is deposited on plate cathodes in two separate processing steps. Final concentrations <100 ppm are difficult to obtain; low current efficiencies, long processing times, and brittle deposits are typical problems. In view of tightening regulations that specify lower effluent concentrations for silverupper limits of 20 ppm are under discussion in the European Unionmore powerful removal technologies will be required. In addition, an advanced technology that achieves the silver removal in a one-step unit operation, along with lower investment and utility costs, should be of interest to processors of silver-containing streams. Our company has developed such a technology, and we describe it as it is applied to photographic effluents. The processThe underlying principle is the relative nobility of metallic silver. A low reduction potential is required to reduce silver ion to the metallic state, and it is similarly easy to induce its crystallization and precipitation from the liquid phase.
When heated to the desired temperature, silver is reduced to the metallic state, and a slurry of small crystals is formed. The residence time and temperature are adjusted to obtain the desired final silver concentration. Finally, the slurry is cooled to <100 °C and depressurized. The heat is recovered and used to warm the next batch of influent. The cooled slurry, from which the silver particles settle out quickly, is passed through a simple filter. The filter cake is dried and melted to produce the desired silver bullion. Final silver concentrations of 20 ppm can easily be attained in the effluent. Our company proposes to use a non-backmixing reactor system, as distinct from the standard continuously stirred tank reactor. We use an inexpensive plug-flow pipe reactor with controlled heat transfer and stationary mixing elements. With this system and a starting silver concentration of 2.5 g/L in the influent, the concentration can be reduced to 20 ppm in ~60 min at 120 °C after controlled heating to the operating temperature in 35 min. The purity of the silver cake, and the eventual metal bullion, depends on the following factors:
Investment and operating costsThe processing setup is simple. It consists of a pump, the pipe reactor, a depressurizing valve, and a filter unit. For the plug-flow pipe reactor, a simple engineering system is chosen: Using a tubeshell heat exchanger design, several straight pipe segments are connected to obtain a reactor element with a length of, say, 100 m (e.g., 10 pipes of 10 m each). Three such units would be used for heating, maintaining temperature, and cooling. The heatingcooling control of the three units is integrated. Pipe diameter and length depend on the processing requirements (volume per hour), and thus determine the capital investment. In any case, the investment and operating costs will be considerably lower than that for the conventional electrolysis cells. For the 2.5 g/L stream in the example, we estimated the total variable costs at U.S. $1/m3. State of the technologyThe development work on the process was carried out on a pilot scale: A pipe reactor of up to 250 m in length and operating temperatures of 200 °C is available. The process can be scaled up without problems to volumes of several cubic meters per hour. The process can be optimized in the pilot plant for the specific requirements of different streams. Based on the information generated, turnkey plants can be delivered.
Volker G. Aurich is general manager and Joep I. A. Koene is project manager at CES B.V. (Wildekamp 1B, 6704 AT Wageningen, The Netherlands; +31-317-421114; fax +31-317-424716; ces@bart.nl). |
||
|